Strong · Live registry status hidden for guests
7 chars·.info
crisp, easy to say, with genuine English word
Members see the go / watch / skip call synthesized from DQS, aftermarket valuation, registration cost, lifecycle stage, and trademark check. The judgment, not just the inputs.
Sign up free to unlock →Members see real-time RDAP state, registrar, and registration cost — the data that tells you if this name is actually catchable right now or already gone.
Sign up free to unlock →Rough aftermarket estimate
$11 — $44
DQS 51 · .info · 7ch
Directional only — a gut-check range, not an appraisal. Uses DQS + TLD + length; doesn’t know about comps, trademarks, or brand context. Treat as “worth looking at” vs “skip,” not a bid price.
| Length | 7 |
| TLD | .info |
| Keyword category | none |
| Commercial intent | none |
| Wayback snapshots | none |
| Brandable combo | no |
| Spam pattern | no |
| Saturated suffix | none |
The SLD "replied" gives replied.info built-in semantic weight, which shifts the domain's value toward exact-match search demand. 7 characters is a workable length — shorter is always better for domain value, but medium-length names still ship daily in real products. It is balanced between vowels and consonants — typical for a pronounceable English-style name. .info is a content-oriented TLD, which narrows the buyer pool but works well for publishers and information products. The Wayback Machine has no archived snapshots of the domain, suggesting it was parked or lightly used in any prior registrations. At DQS 51, the name sits in the mid band — not an automatic buy, but worth evaluating against a specific use case rather than on its own merits. Because the name is still in redemption (day 2 of 30), its future is largely controlled by whether the prior registrant pays the restore fee. Bottom line: evaluate this one against a specific use case you have in mind. Mid-band names don't sell themselves — they sell when the buyer is already looking.
Web-presence signal
None observed
No meaningful Wayback record. Backlink research rarely pays off here.
Deep-link into backlink checkers
Real backlink counts come from dedicated crawlers (Ahrefs, Moz, Majestic). Each button opens replied.info pre-loaded in that tool — zero keystrokes to cross-check.
1
drop recorded so far
Apr 29, 2026
first observed
Apr 29, 2026
last observed
Stronger alternatives
Domains in the same TLD and length band that our pipeline rates above the one you’re viewing. Click through for the full dossier on each.
Track this domain
Drop your email — we’ll create your free account, add this domain to your watchlist, and notify you when it changes lifecycle stage. One-click confirm. No password required.
We only send a welcome email until you confirm your account. No spam, unsubscribe in one click.
Same TLD, similar length, similar DQS. Useful if you're scoping a portfolio of related shapes.
Social handle availability
A 404 on the profile page means the handle is free to claim. Grabbing matching handles at registration time is cheap insurance against impersonation + easier brand rollout later.
Other domains that dropped at the same registrar on 2026-04-29. Registrars often drop batches of expired portfolios together — worth a scan if you like this shape.
Members see which drop-catcher (DropCatch, SnapNames, NameJet, GoDaddy, Dynadot) gives the highest catch rate for this exact name + drop window. Pick wrong and a bot wins it.
Sign up free to unlock →Majestic · Site Explorer
Trust Flow + Citation Flow. Sample rows free.
No Wayback Machine snapshots found for replied.info.